Volume 25, Issue 10 (1-2019)
RJMS 2019, 25(10): 1-9 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jasemi M, Ahangarzadeh Rezae S I, Hemmati M, Madadipoor N, Cheraghi R. Evaluation of the effect of evaluation using the direct observation skills (DOPS) and traditional methods on nursing students' clinical skills learning, 2016. RJMS 2019; 25 (10) :1-9
URL: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-5104-en.html
URL: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-5104-en.html
Madineh Jasemi 
, Soheila i Ahangarzadeh Rezae , Masoomeh Hemmati , Nasim Madadipoor , Rozita Cheraghi
, Soheila i Ahangarzadeh Rezae , Masoomeh Hemmati , Nasim Madadipoor , Rozita Cheraghi
Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran , jasemi.phd@gmail.com
Abstract: (3916 Views)
Background: Nursing student's skills evaluation plays a vital role in their professional education, but unfortunately; the quality of many evaluation methods is less than optimal. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of evaluation by using Direct Observation of Clinical Skills (DOPS) and traditional methods on nursing students' clinical skills in 2016.
Methods: In a quasi-experimental study, 108 senior nursing students were selected and then randomly assigned into two groups of case and control. In the case group was evaluated the skills related to dressing, intra-vein catheterization and suction by DOPS method and in the control group these skills was evaluated by traditional method. Finally, the skills in the two groups were checked by checklist and data were analyzed by using SPSS16 software, descriptive and inferential statistics, Chi-square, independent t-test, Pearson correlation and ANOVA.
Results: Independent T-test showed a significant difference in the mean score of dressing, intra-vein catheterization and suction skills between case and control groups (p<0.001). Also the results showed a significant increase in those skills in the third stage of assessment in the case group, which showed a statistically significant in ANOVA (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Regarding the improvement of clinical skills in case group's students, it is suggested that the DOPS evaluation method as a high-performance, objective, validated method is used for assessing clinical skills and evaluating the learning of nursing students as well as accepting responsibility professionals in medical sciences.
Methods: In a quasi-experimental study, 108 senior nursing students were selected and then randomly assigned into two groups of case and control. In the case group was evaluated the skills related to dressing, intra-vein catheterization and suction by DOPS method and in the control group these skills was evaluated by traditional method. Finally, the skills in the two groups were checked by checklist and data were analyzed by using SPSS16 software, descriptive and inferential statistics, Chi-square, independent t-test, Pearson correlation and ANOVA.
Results: Independent T-test showed a significant difference in the mean score of dressing, intra-vein catheterization and suction skills between case and control groups (p<0.001). Also the results showed a significant increase in those skills in the third stage of assessment in the case group, which showed a statistically significant in ANOVA (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Regarding the improvement of clinical skills in case group's students, it is suggested that the DOPS evaluation method as a high-performance, objective, validated method is used for assessing clinical skills and evaluating the learning of nursing students as well as accepting responsibility professionals in medical sciences.
Keywords: Clinical evaluation, Nursing, Direct Observation of Clinical Skills (DOPS), Clinical skills
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Educational Nursing
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
