Volume 26, Issue 7 (10-2019)
RJMS 2019, 26(7): 10-23 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Radfar H, Bavardi Moghadam E, Sanei M. Evaluation of knee joint proprioception changes forces following a period of a static and dynamic stretching of hamstrings, quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles. RJMS 2019; 26 (7) :10-23
URL: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-5516-en.html
URL: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-5516-en.html
MSc in Corrective Exercise and Sport Injury, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran , bavardi.e@gmail.com
Abstract: (4877 Views)
Background: One of the most important factors in the proper functioning of the military is the accurate assessment of feedback. Among these, the proper knee joint proprioception is one of the most important factors in this regard. This study was performed to evaluate knee joint proprioception changes in military forces following a period of a static and dynamic stretching of hamstrings, quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles.
Methods: The study was semi-experimental. The population of the study included the men AJA air defense base of Khatam al-Anbia (PBUH), among which, 60 individuals were randomly divided into three groups of 20; Static (height: 173.27, Weight: 78.14), Dynamic (Height: 175.08, Weight: 76.92), and Control (Height: 176.12, Weight: 80.09). The subjects in both groups of static and dynamic stretching performed their group-specific stretching programs. The goniometric method of digital images was used to measure the knee joint proprioception using AutoCAD software. One-way variance analysis test and paired t-test were used for results. The significance level in the present paper was considered to be 95% (α≤0.05) (SPSS 22).
Results: The results of the knee joint proprioception variables showed a significant difference with the control group (slight increase), between the static groups (decrease, p=0.05) and the dynamics (decrease, p=0.004). There was also a significant difference in the measured variables in the in-group comparison in the static group (decrease, p=0323) and dynamics (decrease, p=0.002). (Reducing the absolute error values of the target angle reconstruction and, consequently, improving the knee joint propensity sensitivity).
Conclusion: Static and dynamic stretching exercises in the lower extremity can possibly affect muscle spikes, increase muscle temperature, trigger the activation phenomenon, repeat the movement in a specific pattern, and ultimately the phenomenon of post-traptional sensory drainage, increase the sensitivity of muscle receptors and ultimately improve the sense of knee joint condition. Since any proprioception sense of depression can lead to mechanical instability and ultimately cause the joint to be prone to mild blows and ultimately damage, stretching exercises may also change the muscle spindle properties and increase the knee proprioception. Also, dynamic stretching improves the ability to perform better in the knee joint proprioception variable relative to static stretchinglearning of nursing students as well as accepting responsibility professionals in medical sciences.
Methods: The study was semi-experimental. The population of the study included the men AJA air defense base of Khatam al-Anbia (PBUH), among which, 60 individuals were randomly divided into three groups of 20; Static (height: 173.27, Weight: 78.14), Dynamic (Height: 175.08, Weight: 76.92), and Control (Height: 176.12, Weight: 80.09). The subjects in both groups of static and dynamic stretching performed their group-specific stretching programs. The goniometric method of digital images was used to measure the knee joint proprioception using AutoCAD software. One-way variance analysis test and paired t-test were used for results. The significance level in the present paper was considered to be 95% (α≤0.05) (SPSS 22).
Results: The results of the knee joint proprioception variables showed a significant difference with the control group (slight increase), between the static groups (decrease, p=0.05) and the dynamics (decrease, p=0.004). There was also a significant difference in the measured variables in the in-group comparison in the static group (decrease, p=0323) and dynamics (decrease, p=0.002). (Reducing the absolute error values of the target angle reconstruction and, consequently, improving the knee joint propensity sensitivity).
Conclusion: Static and dynamic stretching exercises in the lower extremity can possibly affect muscle spikes, increase muscle temperature, trigger the activation phenomenon, repeat the movement in a specific pattern, and ultimately the phenomenon of post-traptional sensory drainage, increase the sensitivity of muscle receptors and ultimately improve the sense of knee joint condition. Since any proprioception sense of depression can lead to mechanical instability and ultimately cause the joint to be prone to mild blows and ultimately damage, stretching exercises may also change the muscle spindle properties and increase the knee proprioception. Also, dynamic stretching improves the ability to perform better in the knee joint proprioception variable relative to static stretchinglearning of nursing students as well as accepting responsibility professionals in medical sciences.
Keywords: Proprioception, Static stretching, Dynamic stretching, hamstrings, quadriceps and Gastrocnemius muscles
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Sports Physiotherapy
References
1. 1. Cruz AL, Oliveira R, Silva AG. Exercise based interventions for physically active individuals with
2. functional ankle instability: a Syst literature Rev. J Sports Med and Phys Fitness; 2018.59(4):666-675.
3. 2. Bavardi Moghadam E, Shojaedin SS, Ghanizadeh hesar N, Akbarnejad A. [Evaluation of knee proprioception changes in older men with knee osteoarthritis following a period of controlled aerobic activity]. J Sport Med; 2018.9(2): 153-167 [Persian].
4. 3. Négyesi J , Mobark A , Zhang LY , Hortobagyi T , Nagatomi R. An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults. PLoS One; 2018.13(9):e0203288.
5. 4. Domínguez-Navarro F , Igual-Camacho C , Silvestre-Muñoz A , Roig-Casasús S , Blasco JM . Effects of balance and proprioceptive training on total hip and knee replacement rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture; 2018.62:68-74.
6. 5. Zimmer A, Burandt A, Kent C, Mikolajczyk T, Bradbury E, Knobloch MJ, Van Laarhoven R. The effects of acute stretching on running economy. J Undergrad Kinesiol; 2007.3(1):52-61.
7. 6. Nameni F, Kashef M, Lari A. [Impact on the relation between CK and LDH in the period of women's athletic recovery]. Quart Olympics; 2004.4(28):97-107 [Persian].
8. 7. Allison Sarah J, Bailey DM, Folland JP. Prolonged static stretching does not influence running economy despite changes in neuromuscular function. J Sports Sci; 2008:1489-95.
9. 8. Moss, D. Sport science: Static stretching before exercise reduces explosive power. Phys Edu Digest; 2002.19(2):24-5.
10. 9. Ghai S, Schmitz G, Hwang TH, Effenberg AO. Auditory Proprioceptive Integration: Effects of Real-Time Kinematic Auditory Feedback on Knee Proprioception. Front Neurosci; 2018.12:142.
11. 10. Streepey JW, Mock MJ, Riskowski JL, VanWye WR, Vitvitskiy BM, Mikesky AE. Effects of quadriceps and hamstrings proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on knee movement sensation. J Strength Cond Res; 2010.24(4):1037.
12. 11. Moradi AA, Rajabi R, Minoonejad H, Beyranvand R. [The immediate effect of dynamic stretching of quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles on the knee joint proprioception]. Scientific J Rehabil Med; 2015:86-96. [Persian].
13. 12. Ghaffarinejad F, Taghizadeh S, Mohammadi F. Effect of static stretching of muscles surrounding the knee on knee joint position sense. British J Sports Med; 2007.41(10):684-7.
14. 13. Larsen R, Lund H, Christensen R, Røgind H, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H. Effect of static stretching of quadriceps and hamstring muscles on knee joint position sense. British J Sports Med; 2005.39(1):43-6.
15. 14. Torres R, Duarte JA, Cabri JM. An acute bout of quadriceps muscle stretching has no influence on knee joint proprioception. J Hum Kinetic; 2012.34:33-9.
16. 15. Moradi A, Rajabi R, Minoonejad H, Aghaei M. The acute effect of static stretching of quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles on knee joint position sense in football players. PTJ; 2014.4(2):83-9.
17. 16. Behm DG, Chaouachi A. A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. European J Appl Physiol; 2011.111(11):2633-51.
18. 17. Mirbagheri MM, Barbeau H, Kearney RE. Intrinsic and reflex contribution to human ankle stiffness: variation with activation level and position. Experim Brain Res; 2000.135(4):423-36.
19. 18. Konradsen L, Ravn JB, Sorensen AI. Proprioception at the ankle: the effect of anaesthetic blockade of ligament receptors. J Bone Joint Surg; 1993.75(3):433-6.
20. 19. Boyle J, Negus V. Joint position sense in the recurrently sprained ankle. Australian J Phys Ther; 1998.44(3):159.
21. 20. Björklund M, Djupsjöbacka M, Crenshaw AG. Acute muscle stretching and shoulder position sense. J Athletic Train; 2006.41(3):270.
22. 21. Stillman BC. An investigation of the clinical assessment of joint position sense. PhD thesis, Physiotherapy 2000.
23. 22. Lafortune M, Lambert C, Lake M. Skin marker displacement at the knee joint. J Biomech; 1992.26(3): 101–02.
24. 23. Cappozzo A, Catani F, Della Croce U, Leardini A. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech; 1995.10(4):171-8.
25. 24. Tully, E. and B. Stillman. A revised model for 2D kinematic analysis of spine, hip and knee motion in the sagittal plane. In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the World Confederation. Washington. 1995.
26. 25. Pour Kazemi F, Naseri N, Bagheri H, Fakhari Z. [The effect of chronic ankle instability on knee joint position sense]. MRJ; 2009.3(1 and 2):33-42. Persian.
27. 26. Papadopoulos G, Siatras TH, Kellis S. The effect of static and dynamic stretching exercises on the maximal isokinetic strength of the knee extensors and flexors. Isokin Exer Sci;2005.13(4):285-91.
28. 27. Evetovich TK, Nauman NJ, Conley DS, Todd JB. Effect of static stretching of the biceps brachii on torque, electromyography, and mechanomyography during concentric isokinetic muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res; 2003:484-8.
29. 28. Sekir U, Arabaci R, Akova B, Kadagan SM. Acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on leg flexor and extensor isokinetic strength in elite women athletes. Scandinavian J Med Sci Sports; 2010.20(2):268-81.
30. 29. Herda TJ, Cramer JT, Ryan ED, McHugh MP, Stout JR. Acute effects of static versus dynamic stretching on isometric peak torque, electromyography, and mechanomyography of the biceps femoris muscle. J Strength Cond Res; 2008.22(3:809-817.
31. 30. Forouhideh F, Naeimi S , Khademi Kalantari Kh, Rahimi A, Farhadi A. [The short term effects of one-session of whole body vibration training on isokinetic strength of rotator cuff and shoulder proprioception in young healthy subjects]. SJKU; 2011.15(4):52-64. [Persian].
32. 31. Rojhani shirazi Z, Shafaee R, Afarandide M. Survey on the effects of balance training on proprioception of knee and ankle joints and equilibrium time in single leg in healthy female students. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci; 2012.10(4):289-98. [Persian]
33. 32. Nakamura M , Hirabayashi R , Ohya S , Aoki T , Suzuki D , Shimamoto M , Kikumoto T , Ito W , Nakamura E , Takabayashi T , Edama M . Effect of Static Stretching with Superficial Cooling on Muscle Stiffness. Sports Med Int Open; 2018. 2(5):E142-E147.
34. 33. Yamaguchi T, Ishii K. Effects of static stretching for 30 seconds and dynamic stretching on leg extension power. J Strength Cond Res; 2005: 677-83.
35. 34. Arabaci, R. acute effects of differential stretching protocols on physical performance in young soccer players. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy (NWSA); 2009.4(2):50-65
36. 35. Perrier, E. T. The effects of static and dynamic stretching on reaction time and performance in a countermovement jump. Thesis of Master of Science. Oregon State University. 2009.
37. 36. Franco BL, Signorelli GR, Trajano GS, Costa PB, de Oliveira CG. Acute effects of three different stretching protocols on the Wingate test performance. J Sci Med Sport; 2012:1-7
38. 37. Curry BS, Chengkalath D, Crouch GJ, Romance M, Manns PJ. Acute effects of dynamic stretching, static stretching, and light aerobic activity on muscular performance in women. J Strength Cond Res; 2009.23(6):1811-9.
39. 38. Hall, J. E. Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology: Enhanced E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2010.
40. 39. Young WB, Behm DG. Effects of running, static stretching and practice jumps on explosive force production and jumping performance. J Sports Med Phys Fit; 2003.43(1):21-7.
41. 40. Hamada TAKU, Sale DG, Macdougall JD. Postactivation potentiation in endurance-trained male athletes. Med Sci Sports Exer; 2000.32(2):403-11.
42. 41. Hodgson M, Docherty D, Robbins D. Post-activation potentiation underlying physiology and implications for motor performance. Sports Med; 2005.25(7):385-95.
43. 42. Manoel ME, Harris-Love MO, Danoff JV, Miller TA. Acute effects of static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on muscle power in women. J Strength Cond Res; 2008.22(5):1528-34.
44. 43. Church, JB, Wiggins MS, Moode FM, Crist R. Effect of warm-up and flexibility treatments on vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res; 2001:332-36.
45. 44. Knudson D, Bennett K, Corn ROD, Leick D, Smith C. Acute effects of stretching are not evident in the kinematics of the vertical jump. J Strength Cond Res; 2001.15(1):98-101.
46. 45. Nakao S, Ikezoe T, Nakamura M, Umegaki H, Fujita K, Umehara J, et al. Chronic effects of a static stretching program on hamstring strength. J Strength Cond Res; 2019.23 Jan.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
