Abstract: (9162 Views)
The worldwide prevalence of dyspepsia is %7-41 that less than 50% of them visit a doctor. Many sources of medical and costs servises are spend for this problem. Decision about treatment against H.Pylori is contraversy that may due to different prevalence of H.Pylori in ulcer like with non ulcer like patients who have non ulcer dyspepsia. We want assess the prevalence of H.Pylori between UL and NUL patients. This analytic cross-sectional study is done on 120 patients with NUD. Patients were symptomatic more than 3 months and were examined clinicaly and paraclinicaly(CBC, serum amylase, T3, T4, TSH, LFT, Sex3, abdominal sonograghy, ECG, endoscopy), by rule out of other diagnoses, type of dyspepsia was determined. H.Pylori was determined according to culture or urease test. T-test, Chi2, corelation coefficient were used for analysis. 68.3% of patients had H.Pylori. percent of patients with H.Pylori in subgroups of patients with NUD were significantly different(P = 0.00001) but mean of age was the same. Correlation between type of dyspepsia and H.Pylori was nonsignificant. According to this study H.Pylori or age are not efficient for a specific type of NUD. Eradiction of H.Pylori were alwayes unable for reducing of symptoms of patients in long term. H.Pylori is not a suitable cause for NUD and eradication of H.Pylori isn’t advised in all of these patients, yet.
Type of Study:
Research |
Subject:
Gastroentrology