Volume 24, Issue 165 (3-2018)                   RJMS 2018, 24(165): 22-29 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ahmadzadeh Heshmati A, Karimi Mobarakeh M, saied A. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Youg and Bergess classification for fractures of the pelvic ring. RJMS 2018; 24 (165) :22-29
URL: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4822-en.html
Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran , arsaiedmd@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3883 Views)

Background: Determination of interobserver and intraobserver reliability are one of the most important issue in educations with are necessary for validation of classifications.
Methods: Radiographies and CT scans of 160 patients were assessed by three orthopedics to determination of the anatomic location of fractures and to determine classification of fractures according to Young and Burgess classification and then the agreement between observers and among each observer was assessed.
Results: Pubic rami were the most common anatomic fractures and LC I was the most common fracture type. CT scan was increased significantly the accuracy of diagnosis of fractures of the sacrum and ilium. Interobserver reliability to determination of the fracture type was 0.35 (0.28–0.52) using radiography alone, and was 0.49 (0.44–0.76) using both radiographies and CT scan. The least agreement was observed in types LC II and APC II. Intraobserver reliability in this field were 0.40 (0.31–0.58), 0.41 (0.32–0.51) and 0.44 (0.36–0.55) for three observers using radiographies alone and 0.54 (0.39–0.77), 0.53 (0.42-0.72) and 0.55 (0.46–0.73) respectively using radiographies and CT scans.
Conclusion: there were acceptable interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities in Young and Burgess classification and our results approximately were the same as other studies.
 
 

Full-Text [PDF 763 kb]   (1260 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (2035 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Orthopedic

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 | Razi Journal of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb