Volume 9, Issue 30 (12-2002)
RJMS 2002, 9(30): 349-355 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Roohi pour M, Varasteh Kia G, Tehrani Banihashemi S, Moradi Lakeh M. COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF BOWEL PREPARATION: THE EFFICACY OF CASTOR OIL PLUS COTRIMOXAZOLE, METRONIDAZOLE AND CEFTIZOXIME (CCMC), Vs, POLY ETHYLENE GLYCOL PLUS NEOMYCIN, ERYTHROMYCIN AND CEFAMANDOL(PNEC): A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLINDED STUDY. RJMS 2002; 9 (30) :349-355
URL: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-310-en.html
URL: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-310-en.html
Abstract: (8166 Views)
ABSTRACT
To compare colon cleansing and complications after two methods of bowel preparation: castor oil plus Cotrimoxazole – Metronidazole – Ceftizoxime (CCMC) versus Polyethylenglycol plus Neomycin-Erythromycin – Cefamandol (PNEC).
Sixty patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery were randomized to receive above-mentioned regimens. The adequacy of colon cleansing were evaluated by blinded surgeon during operation. Proportion of acceptable cleansing was 90% in CCMC receivers and 96% in PNEC receivers (non Significant, power: 97.5%). Abdominal pain was more common in PNEC receivers compared with CCMC receivers (15%vs. 40%, P<0.05). Infectious complications were seen in 13.3% of CCMC receivers and 10% of PNEC receivers (not statisticaly difference). CCMC regimen is an effective, safe and cheap method for bowel preparation its usage is recommended.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Community Medicine
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
