ABSTRACT
Prevalence of diabetes in the families is important. There are difference in prevalence of the disease in different cultures and different areas. We studied prevalence of diabetes in relatives of patients in our country. This study was descriptive and retroespective. Patient selection was convenience. There was 432 records of diabetic patients which were hospitalised in Firooz-Abadi Hospital from 1998 to 1999. From 378 records informations about type of diabetes, sex and history of diabetes in their relative were extracted and analysed with Chi–Square (X2–test). Prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 78.6% and of type 1 was 21.4%, most were female (type 1 63%, type 2 66%). Diabetes in relatives was type 1 47%, type 2 28%. First degree relatives were more involved than other relatives. Parents were more involved than others, specialy mothers (P=0.0006 in type 1 DM and P=0.001 in type 2). In mothers transmitions to daughters was more than sons (type 1 P=0.001, type 2 P=0.00004). Prevalence of diabetes in relative of type 1 diabetes is more than type 2 and females are more involved than males. Diabetes in parents especialy in motheres was than other relatives. Transmition from mothers to daugthers was more than sons (type 1 diabetes P=0.001, type 2 P=0.00004). Genetic transmition in Iranian people is different from other countries and more studies can be done in this area.
The goal of this study was detection of common predisposing factors for diabetic ketoacidosis, which can be a guide for prevention. Also to know, complications and rate of mortality which can be a guide to know difficulties in treatment. This study was descriptive and sampling was in convennience method. About 50 patients were studied in Firooz Abadi Hospital during 1993-1998. Analysis of informations was with Chi-Square (X2-test) method. Common etiology was related to using drugs 52%, infection 26%, unknown 12% and unawarness of disease 10%. Complication were hyperkalemia 24%, hyperkalemia11%, resistance to insulin 4%, cardiac complications 20%, GI bleeding 8%, hypoglycemia 8%, renal failure 6%, adult respiratory distress syndrom (ARDS) 2% and disseminated intravascular coagulations (DIC) 6%.
Other complications were rare. Mortality was 18% and was significant in older age (P = 0.01), in septicemia and pneumonia as the etiologies of the condition (P = 0.002, P = 0.003 respectively) and in some types of complications (like cardiac complications, DIC, ARDS, renal failure) and also in multiple complications. Therefore most common predisposing factor for diabetic ketoacidosis is incorrect use of drug, specialy discontinuing insulin. Most common complications is hypokalemia and hyperkalemia and cardiac complications. In some complications like cardiac, DIC, ARDS and renal failure, mortality were significant.
Background: Pneumothorax may be associated with penetrating or blunt chest traumas' that need early diagnosis and treatment. Today the diagnosis modalities are CXR and CT-Scan that are not suitable for unstable patients. Chest sonography can be a fast diagnostic method at patient bedside. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of bedside ultrasonography in diagnosis of pneumothorax.
Methods: In this prospective study, 60 cases suspicious of pneumothorax were included in study. Bedside ultrasonography was performed for all the cases. Sonography site was between parasternal and midclavicular lines in 2nd to 4th intercostals spaces of both thoracic sites and performed between 5-10 respiratory cycles. Gold standard results for definite diagnosis were: positive results of chest X ray, chest CT scan and/or air leak after needle or tube thoracostomy. In suspicious results, CT scan was done. Data were analyzed accordingly with statistic tests of “Chi-Square” and “Fisher’s Exact Test”. SPSS V.12 was also used.
Results: Trauma mechanism in 5 cases (8.3%) was stab wound, and in 53 cases(88.3%) multiple trauma there was 1 case of tuberculosis and 1 case of blunt chest trauma as well. Eleven out of the 12 pneumothorax cases (proven by chest Xray or CT scan) were diagnosed by bedside sonography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of bedside ultrasonography for diagnosis of pneumothorax were 91.6%, 100%, 100%, 97.9% and 98.6%, respectively.
Conclusion: With respect to the results of this study and previous studies, bedside ultrasonography is a good method for diagnosis of pneumothorax.
Page 1 from 1 |
© 2025 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 | Razi Journal of Medical Sciences
Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb