Volume 23, Issue 143 (5-2016)                   RJMS 2016, 23(143): 8-17 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moradan S, Mirmohammadkhani M, Semnani V, Moghadas M. Comparison of pap smear quality with cytobrush-spatula versus cervix brush method. RJMS 2016; 23 (143) :8-17
URL: http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3358-en.html
Research center of abnormal uterine bleeding , Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran , sm42595@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (6936 Views)

Background: Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide. One of the methods of early diagnosis of this cancer is the screening pap smear test that has decreased both the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. The aim of this study was comparison of pap smear quality with spatula-cytobrush versus cervix brush methods.

Methods: One hundred married women between 21 to65 years old participated in this single blind clinical trial. First samples were obtained with a spatula- cytobrush or cervix brush. Thirty days later another sample was obtained from the same person with another device. Slides were prepared and assessed by same pathologist and described base on BETHESDA method.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences regarding cell adequacy in number of squamous cell between the two methods (p=0.093) as well as the difference in the bloody sample (p=0.082) and atrophy (p=1.00), but the differences were significant about the presence of endocervical cells. The presence of endocervical cells was 93.9% in spatula-cytobrushand 65.9% in cervix brush (p=0.021).

Conclusion: There were no differences regarding cell adequacy in number of squamous cell and bloody sample between two methods, but the presence of endocervical cells was more in spatula-cyto brush. Therefore, we recommend using spatula-cyto brush for pap smear sampling.

Full-Text [PDF 777 kb]   (2492 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Pathology

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 | Razi Journal of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb