Razi Journal of Medical Sciences

fa مقایسه سبک‌های دلبستگی و سبک‌های فرزندپروری نوجوانان با و بدون نشانگان ضربه عشقی Comparison of Attachment Styles and Parenting Styles of Teenagers with and without Love Trauma Syndrome روانشناسی بالینی Clinical Psychiatry پژوهشي Research <div style="text-align: justify;">زمینه و هدف: ضربه عشقی بر افراد تأثیرات زیانباری دارد و موجب تعارضات و گسستگی‌های فردی، اجتماعی و گاهی خانوادگی و نیز واکنش‌های روانشناختی آسیب‌زایی در آسیب دیدگان می‌شود. بنابر این هدف از ‌انجام‌ پژوهش ‌حاضر مقایسه سبک‌های دلبستگی و سبک‌های فرزند پروری نوجوانان، با و بدون نشانگان ضربه عشقی بود. روش کار: روش پژوهش حاضر، علی مقایسهای (پس رویدادی) بود. جامعه‌ آماری پژوهش حاضر را ‌120 نفر از دانش آموزان دختر مقطع متوسطه دوم و مادرانشان در شهرستان ساوه تشکیل دادند که از بین این تعداد 60 نفر دختر بدون شکست عاطفی و 60 نفر دختر با نشانگان شکست عاطفی شهرستان ساوه در سال تحصیلی 1402-1401 به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشهای چند مرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. ‌برای‌ گردآوری ‌داده‌ها ‌از ‌پرسشنامه‌ی سبک‌های دلبستگی کولینز و رید (1990)، ضربهی عشق راس (1999) و فرزند پروری بامریند (1973) استفاده ‌شد. یافته‌ها: نتایج حاصل از تحلیل دادهها با مدل آماری تحلیل واریانس چند عاملی ‌نشان‌ داد بین دو گروه با و بدون نشانگان ضربه عشقی، در مولفه‌های دلبستگی ایمن، دلبستگی دوسوگرا، دلبستگی اجتنابی تفاوت معنادار وجود دارد. همچنین بین دو گروه با و بدون نشانگان ضربه عشقی، در مولفه‌های فرزند پروری سهلگیرانه، استبدادی و فرزندپروری قاطعانه تفاوت معنادار وجود دارد. نتیجه‌گیری: این بررسی به طور کلی  بر اهمیت سبکهای دلبستگی و شیوه‌های فرزند پروری بر روابط عاشقانه در نوجوانی تأکید دارد که نیازمند توجه بالینی است.</div> <div style="text-align: justify;"> Background & Aims: Adolescence is a period of a person's life, accompanied by pressure, crisis, and numerous physical and mental changes, which are associated with problems. There is also a lot of psychological, social, and communication involved. Romantic relationships are very common in youth and nearly 65% of teenagers experience it. Close relationships between people, especially the phenomenon of love between two opposite sexes, have a significant impact on various aspects of human life, especially psychological aspects. On the other hand, emotional failure is one of the most severe shocks that occur to people, especially during adolescence and youth. It seems that the severity of this emotional failure is more evident in adolescence because adolescence is accompanied by early emotions. It is transitory and unstable and far from thinking about the future, and it is associated with interest in the opposite sex that in this period of life, people allow themselves to enter into the realm of each other's emotional feelings. The results of some studies indicate that our friendships between two opposite sexes give them the opportunity to empathize and express intimacy and lead to the mutual trust of both parties in the relationship. Love shock has harmful effects on people and causes personal, social, and sometimes family conflicts and dissociations, as well as psychological reactions in the victims. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to compare attachment styles and parenting styles of teenagers with and without love trauma syndromes. Methods: The method of the current research was a causal comparison (post-event). The statistical population of the present study was made up of 120 female students of the second secondary level and their mothers in Saveh city, of which 60 were girls without emotional breakdown and 60 were girls with symptoms of emotional breakdown in Saveh city in the academic year of 1402-1401 using the method Multi-stage cluster random sampling was chosen. To collect data, the attachment styles questionnaire of Collins and Reed (1990), Ross's Love Shock (1999), and Baumrind's Parenting (1973) were used. In this research, to compare the scores of each group at different levels, multivariate analysis of variance and SPSS software version 22 was used. Results: There is a significant difference in the secure attachment component between the two groups with and without love trauma symptoms (F=5.076 (1.118) and P<0.01). In this way, the secure attachment score of people with love shock syndrome is significantly higher than the group of teenagers without love shock syndrome. The group variable explains 1% of the variance of secure attachment. There is a significant difference between the two groups with and without love trauma symptoms in the ambivalent attachment component (F (1.118) = 4.016 and P < 0.01). In this way, the ambivalent attachment score of people in teenagers with love shock syndrome is significantly higher than the group of teenagers without love shock syndrome. The group variable explains 1% of the variance of ambivalent attachment. There is a significant difference between the two groups with and without love trauma symptoms in the avoidant attachment component (F (1.118) = 4.058 and P < 0.01). In this way, the avoidant attachment score of people with love shock syndrome is significantly higher than the group of teenagers without love shock syndrome. The group variable explains 1% of the variance of avoidant attachment. The results of data analysis with the statistical model of multifactor analysis of variance showed that there is a significant difference between the two groups with and without love trauma syndrome in the components of secure attachment, ambivalent attachment, and avoidant attachment. Also, there is a significant difference between the two groups with and without love trauma syndromes in the components of permissive parenting, autocratic parenting, and assertive parenting. Conclusion: The purpose of this study was to compare attachment styles and parenting styles of teenagers with and without love trauma syndrome. The results of the present study showed that between two groups with and without love trauma syndromes, in the components of secure attachment, biased and avoidant, as well as between two groups with and without love trauma syndromes, in the components of easy parenting styles. There is a significant difference between obsessive, authoritarian, and decisive. This review generally emphasizes the importance of attachment styles and parenting methods in romantic relationships in adolescence, which requires clinical attention. It seems that the patterns and incorrect behaviors of parents that lead to the formation of adverse experiences with parents (primary caregivers) are stored under the title of internal functioning models, which can affect a person's cognition. His beliefs and convictions are effective towards himself and others and ultimately act as a barrier against an important mechanism for regulating the emotions, emotions, and distress of a person. Because parents can influence people's attitudes about interpersonal relationships and their expectations of relationships by providing a positive or negative model. A person with secure attachment and strong communication skills expresses his emotions and needs correctly. In addition, attachment can be considered the fundamental element of human evolution, as a result of this process, an emotional bond is created in the relationship between mother and baby. People with a secure attachment style are independent, friendly, and warm and have an active spirit to seek participation. People with a secure attachment style feel happy, friendly, and self-confident in their close relationships and have high self-esteem. Secure attachment creates a willingness to appreciate, care for, and sacrifice the people who are important in one's life. They must respond to these feelings as well. Therefore, they do not fail in their relationships. According to the research, we found that teenagers with secure attachment styles experience less love and emotional trauma, and there is a significant difference between secure attachment styles in teenagers with and without love trauma symptoms. </div> سبک‌های فرزند پروری, سبک‌های دلبستگی, نشانگان ضربه عشقی Parenting Styles, Attachment Styles, Love Shock Syndrome 157 165 http://rjms.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-7709-1&slc_lang=fa&sid=1 Yunus Kihani Far یونس کیهانی فر 3900319475328460081335 0009-0007-5179-7688 No Department of General Psychology, Khuzestan Branch, University Jihad Institute of Higher Education, Khuzestan, Iran. گروه روانشناسی عمومی، واحد خوزستان، موسسه آموزش عالی جهاد دانشگاهی، خوزستان، ایران. Nasim Qara Shikhlo نسیم قره شیخلو n_shekhloo1400@yahoo.com 3900319475328460081336 0009-0007-5759-6334 Yes Senior Department of Clinical Psychology, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran گروه ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، واحد اسلامشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلام شهر، ایران Zahra Mirzaei زهرا میرزایی 3900319475328460081337 0009-0006-7598-478X No Graduate Department of Clinical Psychology, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran. گروه ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرمسار، ایران Sahar Houshmandi سحر هوشمندی 3900319475328460081338 0009-0003-5244-0163 No Senior Department of Career Counseling, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran گروه ارشد مشاوره شغلی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. Hengameh Safar Qoli هنگامه صفرقلی 3900319475328460081339 0009-0002-9124-4021 No Senior Department of Clinical Psychology, Roudhan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudhan, Iran. گروه ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران.