Research code: مقاله مروری کد اخلاق نیاز ندارد
Ethics code: مقاله مروری کد اخلاق نیاز ندارد
Clinical trials code: مقاله مروری کد اخلاق نیاز ندارد
Kashan University , fkazeminasab@kashanu.ac.ir
Abstract: (208 Views)
Background: Type 2 diabetes is a metabolic disorder characterized by high blood glucose in conditions of insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency. This meta-analysis aims to compare the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on lipid profile and body composition in type 2 diabetes
Methods: A systematic search of English and Persian articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, SID, and Magiran databases was conducted until August 2023. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of HIIT and MICT on lipid profile and body composition in type 2 diabetes. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 test, and publication bias was evaluated by visual analysis of funnel plot and Egger's test. Data analysis was done using CMA2 software.
Results: 10 studies including 11 exercise interventions and 297 patients with type 2 diabetes were meta-analyzed. The results showed that HIIT caused a significant change in serum LDL [WMD=0.84 mg/dl (-2.49 to 4.19], P=0.6], HDL [WMD=0.3 mmHg (-2.08 to 2.15], P=0.6], TG [WMD=1.06 mg/dl (-14.94 to 12.83], P=0.8], TC [WMD=2.38 (-8.1 to 3.32), P=0.4], fat percent [WMD=-0.61 (-3.64 to 2.41], P=0.6], and fat mass [WMD=-0.76 (-1.8 to 0.28), P=0.1], compared with MICT in patients with T2DM.
Conclusion: The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that HIIT has similar benefits to MICT on lipid profile and body composition, although HIIT is a more time-efficient training method.
Methods: A systematic search of English and Persian articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, SID, and Magiran databases was conducted until August 2023. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of HIIT and MICT on lipid profile and body composition in type 2 diabetes. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 test, and publication bias was evaluated by visual analysis of funnel plot and Egger's test. Data analysis was done using CMA2 software.
Results: 10 studies including 11 exercise interventions and 297 patients with type 2 diabetes were meta-analyzed. The results showed that HIIT caused a significant change in serum LDL [WMD=0.84 mg/dl (-2.49 to 4.19], P=0.6], HDL [WMD=0.3 mmHg (-2.08 to 2.15], P=0.6], TG [WMD=1.06 mg/dl (-14.94 to 12.83], P=0.8], TC [WMD=2.38 (-8.1 to 3.32), P=0.4], fat percent [WMD=-0.61 (-3.64 to 2.41], P=0.6], and fat mass [WMD=-0.76 (-1.8 to 0.28), P=0.1], compared with MICT in patients with T2DM.
Conclusion: The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that HIIT has similar benefits to MICT on lipid profile and body composition, although HIIT is a more time-efficient training method.
Keywords: -intensity interval training, Moderate-intensity continuous training, Lipid profile, Body composition, Type 2 diabetes
Type of Study: review article |
Subject:
Exercise Physiology
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |